Guest Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 A couple of weeks ago (3/28/2013), I had opened a Calendar trade BTO GOOG May $800 Call and STO GOOG April $800 Call. $5.05 debit. My intention was that Theta gains would outweigh Volatility losses. After a few days, it occurred to me that the Volatility losses would far outweigh the Theta gains. (Well, it appeared like that at the beginning - but it seems like most Theta gains happen at the end, which makes sense.) So, on 4/2/13, I rolled down the May $800 call to April Week 4 $800 Call. $3.20 credit. My intention was threefold: 1) to reduce possible loss by getting some money back, 2) to reduce the difference in Volatility between the two trades as they would both be close to the earnings date (4/18/2013 AC) and 3) to bet on "Theta spread" between the two positions being wide enough to make money on the trade. I am planning to hold this position til Thursday morning, i.e. the morning of the earnings day. The Theta difference for these calls is about $1.20, I believe, (-$2.08 v -$0.84), but I am a little confused on the Vega 0.32 v 0.53, [April v April Wk4, respectively]. What could make this trade a loss trade? Does the Vega, as listed, mean that the "advantage" (i.e. vega positive?) is to the April Call (with the lower vega)? Many thanks for your help! Quote
Guest Posted April 18, 2013 Posted April 18, 2013 This is the concept we have used successfully with AMZN, GOOG and few other stocks. I think your problem was entering too early. I tend to enter those trades 10-14 days before expiration, and you could get the same trade few days later for 4.30-4.40. However, even with less than ideal entry, the trade is worth about 5.50 now. Not sure that rolling was a good idea. I am considering holding this through earnings today... and the leg expiring this week expiring worthless and the one expiring next week having value approx $2, hopefully. Of course if earnings suck, they may both be $0 come Monday. Your thoughts? Quote
Guest Posted April 18, 2013 Posted April 18, 2013 I closed it at a loss... overall around $0.50 loss per contract/spread. I intended to be directional, but I felt you were right that results could be horrible. My choices were 1/ lose it all if stock tanks, 2/ lose a significant portion if the results were decent and the stock moved towards $800 starting tomorrow and onto next week, and 3/ make some good money if the results were exceptional and the stock moved very close to $800 tomorrow - and then past $800 next week. I decided to be conservative and try not to find out. I appreciate your timely and thoughtful feedback/responses. Quote
Guest Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Totally agree that lower allocation is best. The calls are now $8 each :-) /So, my thinking that it would be worth more than $2 wasn't a bad guess, granted a gamble. However, looking at the $830 calls, (my optimistic assumption of what the $800 calls would be worth if GOOG had tanked, I see that the loss would have been significant. A strangle (i.e. double calendar) held through expiration seems like an interesting idea if I don't pay too much for the d-c-spread. Thanks again. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.